Google vs. America

From Bibliotheca Anonoma
Revision as of 13:57, 25 October 2021 by Quintuplicate (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Four antitrust lawsuits have been filed against Google by state attorneys general, charging it with attempting and conspiring to monopolize interstate commerce. If successful,...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Four antitrust lawsuits have been filed against Google by state attorneys general, charging it with attempting and conspiring to monopolize interstate commerce. If successful, the states concerned will receive threefold the damages caused to their residents by Google's alleged monopolistic behavior.

Such a drastic action, while very unusual for the present time, is not unprecedented in Internet history. The breakup of the Bell System either resulted in or caused the growth of phreaking, depending on your viewpoint. The lawsuit against Microsoft, while its outcome was anticlimactic, did spell the beginning of the end of the domination of Internet Explorer.

It is important to note that because both cases were settled, they are not precedents in the legal sense. Indeed it is arguable that the effect of any civil action, in setting precedent for future cases, is in inverse proportion to its social, economic, and political significance. Hence, as neither aspect of this case is precisely knowable at time of writing, this article needs to cover both.

Overview of the cases

First case

Second case

Third case

Fourth case

US antitrust law in general

Sherman Act and Clayton Act

Pertinent cases interpreting, and acts amending, these laws

Common legal arguments

Monopolization

Parens patriae

Combination in restraint of trade

Possible effect

On archiving

On Internet communities

On regulation of the Internet